: The case is noted in legal scholarship for highlighting issues in the Swedish criminal process, specifically regarding how witness testimony can change between the police investigation and the actual court trial when witnesses are under oath. Accessing the Full Document
As these are public records in Sweden under the principle of public access ( Offentlighetsprincipen ), you can request the official judgment or specific file supplements directly from the court: S_dert_rns_TR_B_5794-16_Aktbil_36_del_1.pdf
: "Aktbil 36" indicates that this is Document 36 in the court's file (the akt ). In Swedish criminal procedure, an Aktbilaga (or Aktbil ) of this number often corresponds to a part of the Preliminary Investigation Report ( Förundersökningsprotokoll or FUP). : The case is noted in legal scholarship
Case resulted in a judgment delivered on September 9, 2016 . Legal experts and government reports, such as SOU 2017:7 , have cited this specific case as an example of complex criminal proceedings. Case resulted in a judgment delivered on September 9, 2016
: Swedish court records are generally public unless they contain sensitive information protected by secrecy. You have the right to be anonymous when requesting these documents.