Identify gaps in logic, insufficient data, or areas where the work fails to meet its stated scope.
Clearly define what the paper or product aims to solve. Q0k97y5mko4o
Conclude by synthesizing your findings into a final recommendation (e.g., Accept, Reject, or Major Revision). This should reflect a balanced view of the current understanding of the topic versus the new findings presented. Identify gaps in logic, insufficient data, or areas
Provide specific suggestions for how to fix identified weaknesses. This should reflect a balanced view of the
To prepare a "deep review" using the principles outlined in this framework and standard academic practices, follow this structured process: 1. Initial Scoping and Summarization
The goal of a deep review is improvement, not just critique.
Start by establishing the context of the work. A deep review should not just list features but understand the author's intent.