Jurnalul Maresalului Antonescu, — I
It documents the forced abdication of King Carol II, the establishment of the National Legionary State , and the deteriorating relationship with the Iron Guard.
For those researching the Eastern Front, the volume details the logistics and command decisions behind the Romanian Army's initial victories and the costly siege of Odessa . Jurnalul Maresalului Antonescu, I
The entries reveal Antonescu’s meticulous (and often erratic) management style, covering everything from capital politico-diplomatic decisions to socio-economic orders. Historical Significance It documents the forced abdication of King Carol
The journal provides specific details on the chaos of the rebellion, including brief but chilling mentions of violence against the Jewish population, such as the devastation of the Calea Rahovei and Dudești neighborhoods. Jurnalul Maresalului Antonescu, I
You can find digital copies or references through platforms like Academia.edu and Scribd .
This publication is valued by historians for its ability to offer a "view from the top," allowing researchers to verify or debunk claims regarding Antonescu’s regime with chronological precision.
It documents the forced abdication of King Carol II, the establishment of the National Legionary State , and the deteriorating relationship with the Iron Guard.
For those researching the Eastern Front, the volume details the logistics and command decisions behind the Romanian Army's initial victories and the costly siege of Odessa .
The entries reveal Antonescu’s meticulous (and often erratic) management style, covering everything from capital politico-diplomatic decisions to socio-economic orders. Historical Significance
The journal provides specific details on the chaos of the rebellion, including brief but chilling mentions of violence against the Jewish population, such as the devastation of the Calea Rahovei and Dudești neighborhoods.
You can find digital copies or references through platforms like Academia.edu and Scribd .
This publication is valued by historians for its ability to offer a "view from the top," allowing researchers to verify or debunk claims regarding Antonescu’s regime with chronological precision.